Social graph data analytics

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods for social graph data analytics to determine the connectivity between nodes within a community are provided. A user may assign user connectivity values to other members of the community, or connectivity values may be automatically harvested or assigned from third parties or based on the frequency of interactions between members of the community. Connectivity values may represent such factors as alignment, reputation, status, and/or influence within a social graph of a network community, or the degree of trust. The paths connecting a first node to a second node may be retrieved, and social graph data analytics may be performed on the retrieved paths. For example, a network connectivity value may be determined from all or a subset of all of the retrieved paths. Network connectivity values and/or other social graph data may be outputted to third-party processes, services, and ratings agencies for use in initiating automatic transactions, making automated network-based or real-world decisions, determining or verifying the identity of a node within the community, scoring or ranking nodes, or making credit-granting decisions.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to networks of individuals and/orentities and network communities and, more particularly, to systems andmethods for determining trust scores or connectivity within or betweenindividuals and/or entities or networks of individuals and/or entities.

The connectivity, or relationships, of an individual or entity within anetwork community may be used to infer attributes of that individual orentity. For example, an individual or entity's connectivity within anetwork community may be used to determine the identity of theindividual or entity (e.g., used to make decisions about identity claimsand authentication), the trustworthiness or reputation of the individualor entity, or the membership, status, and/or influence of thatindividual or entity in a particular community or subset of a particularcommunity.

An individual or entity's connectivity within a network community,however, is difficult to quantify. For example, network communities mayinclude hundreds, thousands, millions, billions or more members. Eachmember may possess varying degrees of connectivity information aboutitself and possibly about other members of the community. Some of thisinformation may be highly credible or objective, while other informationmay be less credible and subjective. In addition, connectivityinformation from community members may come in various forms and onvarious scales, making it difficult to meaningfully compare one member's“trustworthiness” or “competence” and connectivity information withanother member's “trustworthiness” or “competence” and connectivityinformation. Also, many individuals may belong to multiple communities,further complicating the determination of a quantifiable representationof trust and connectivity within a network community. Even if aquantifiable representation of an individual's connectivity isdetermined, it is often difficult to use this representation in ameaningful way to make real-world decisions about the individual (e.g.,whether or not to trust the individual).

Further, it may be useful for these real-world decisions to be madeprospectively (i.e., in advance of an anticipated event). Suchprospective analysis may be difficult as an individual or entity'sconnectivity within a network community may change rapidly as theconnections between the individual or entity and others in the networkcommunity may change quantitatively or qualitatively. This analysisbecomes increasingly complex as if applied across multiple communities.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In view of the foregoing, systems and methods are provided fordetermining the connectivity between nodes within a network communityand inferring attributes, such as trustworthiness or competence, fromthe connectivity. Connectivity may be determined, at least in part,using various graph traversal and normalization techniques described inmore detail below and in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No.61/247,343, filed Sep. 30, 2009, U.S. Provisional Patent ApplicationSer. No. 61/254,313, filed Oct. 23, 2009 and International PatentApplication No. CA2010001531, which are hereby incorporated by referenceherein in their entirety.

In an embodiment, a path counting approach may be used where processingcircuitry is configured to count the number of paths between a firstnode n₁ and a second node n₂ within a network community. A connectivityrating R_(n1n2) may then be assigned to the nodes. The assignedconnectivity rating may be proportional to the number of subpaths, orrelationships, connecting the two nodes, among other possible measures.Using the number of subpaths as a measure, a path with one or moreintermediate nodes between the first node n₁ and the second node n₂ maybe scaled by an appropriate number (e.g., the number of intermediatenodes) and this scaled number may be used to calculate the connectivityrating.

In some embodiments, weighted links are used in addition or as analternative to the subpath counting approach. Processing circuitry maybe configured to assign a relative user weight to each path connecting afirst node n₁ and a second node n₂ within a network community. A userconnectivity value may be assigned to each link. For example, a user orentity associated with node n₁ may assign user connectivity values forall outgoing paths from node n₁. In some embodiments, the connectivityvalues assigned by the user or entity may be indicative of that user orentity's trust in the user or entity associated with node n₂. The linkvalues assigned by a particular user or entity may then be compared toeach other to determine a relative user weight for each link.

The relative user weight for each link may be determined by firstcomputing the average of all the user connectivity values assigned bythat user or node (i.e., the out-link values). If t_(i) is the userconnectivity value assigned to link i, then the relative user weight,w_(i), assigned to that link may be given in accordance with:

w _(i)=1+(t _(i)− t _(i) )²  (1)

In some embodiments, an alternative relative user weight, w_(i)′, may beused based on the number of standard deviations, σ, the userconnectivity value differs from the average value assigned by that useror node. For example, the alternative relative user weight may be givenin accordance with:

$\begin{matrix}{w_{i}^{\prime} = {{1 - {\frac{1}{2 + k^{2}}\mspace{14mu} {where}\mspace{14mu} k}} = \left\{ \frac{0,{{{if}\mspace{14mu} \sigma} = 0}}{\frac{t_{i} - {\overset{\_}{t}}_{i}}{\sigma},{otherwise}} \right\}}} & (2)\end{matrix}$

To determine the overall weight of a path, in some embodiments, theweights of all the links along the path may be multiplied together. Theoverall path weight may then be given in accordance with:

w _(path)=π(w _(i))  (3)

or

w _(path)=π(w _(i)′)  (4)

The connectivity value for the path may then be defined as the minimumuser connectivity value of all the links in the path multiplied by theoverall path weight in accordance with:

t _(path) =w _(path) ×t _(min)  (5)

In some embodiments, only “qualified” paths are used to determineconnectivity values. A qualified path may be a path whose path weight isgreater than or equal to some threshold value. As described in moredetail below, any suitable threshold function may be used to definethreshold values. The threshold function may be based, at least in someembodiments, on empirical data, desired path keep percentages, or both.In some embodiments, threshold values may depend on the length, l, ofthe path. For example, an illustrative threshold function specifying theminimum path weight for path p may be given in accordance with:

$\begin{matrix}{{{threshold}\mspace{14mu} (p)} = \begin{Bmatrix}{0.5,{{{if}\mspace{14mu} l} = 1}} \\{0.428,{{{if}\mspace{14mu} l} = 2}} \\{0.289,{{{if}\mspace{14mu} l} = 3}} \\{0.220,{{{if}\mspace{14mu} l} = 4}} \\{0.216,{{{if}\mspace{14mu} l} = 5}} \\{0.192,{{{if}\mspace{14mu} l} = 6}}\end{Bmatrix}} & (6)\end{matrix}$

To determine path connectivity values, in some embodiments, a parallelcomputational framework or distributed computational framework (or both)may be used. For example, in one embodiment, a number of core processorsimplement an Apache Hadoop or Google MapReduce cluster. This cluster mayperform some or all of the distributed computations in connection withdetermining new path link values and path weights.

The processing circuitry may identify a changed node within a networkcommunity. For example, a new outgoing link may be added, a link may beremoved, or a user connectivity value may have been changed. In responseto identifying a changed node, in some embodiments, the processingcircuitry may re-compute link, path, and weight values associated withsome or all nodes in the implicated network community or communities.

In some embodiments, only values associated with affected nodes in thenetwork community are recomputed after a changed node is identified. Ifthere exists at least one changed node in the network community, thechanged node or nodes may first undergo a prepare process. The prepareprocess may include a “map” phase and “reduce” phase. In the map phaseof the prepare process, the prepare process may be divided into smallersub-processes which are then distributed to a core in the parallelcomputational framework cluster. For example, each node or link change(e.g., tail to out-link change and head to in-link change) may be mappedto a different core for parallel computation. In the reduce phase of theprepare process, each out-link's weight may be determined in accordancewith equation (1). Each of the out-link weights may then be normalizedby the sum of the out-link weights (or any other suitable value). Thenode table may then be updated for each changed node, its in-links, andits out-links.

After the changed nodes have been prepared, the paths originating fromeach changed node may be calculated. Once again, a “map” and “reduce”phase of this process may be defined. During this process, in someembodiments, a depth-first search may be performed of the node digraphor node tree. All affected ancestor nodes may then be identified andtheir paths recalculated.

In some embodiments, to improve performance, paths may be grouped by thelast node in the path. For example, all paths ending with node n₁ may begrouped together, all paths ending with node n₂ may be grouped together,and so on. These path groups may then be stored separately (e.g., indifferent columns of a single database table). In some embodiments, thepath groups may be stored in columns of a key-value store implementingan HBase cluster (or any other compressed, high performance databasesystem, such as BigTable).

In some embodiments, one or more threshold functions may be defined. Thethreshold function or functions may be used to determine the maximumnumber of links in a path that will be analyzed in a connectivitydetermination or connectivity computation. Threshold factors may also bedefined for minimum link weights, path weights, or both. Weights fallingbelow a user-defined or system-defined threshold may be ignored in aconnectivity determination or connectivity computation, while onlyweights of sufficient magnitude may be considered.

In some embodiments, a user connectivity value may represent the degreeof trust between a first node and a second node. In one embodiment, noden₁ may assign a user connectivity value of l₁ to a link between it andnode n₂. Node n₂ may also assign a user connectivity value of l₂ to areverse link between it and node n₁. The values of l₁ and l₂ may be atleast partially subjective indications of the trustworthiness of theindividual or entity associated with the node connected by the link. Forexample, one or more of the individual or entity's reputation within thenetwork community (or some other community), the individual or entity'salignment with the trusting party (e.g., political, social, or religiousalignment), past dealings with the individual or entity, and theindividual or entity's character and integrity (or any other relevantconsiderations) may be used to determine a partially subjective userconnectivity value indicative of trust. A user (or other individualauthorized by the node) may then assign this value to an outgoing linkconnecting the node to the individual or entity. Objective measures(e.g., data from third-party ratings agencies or credit bureaus) mayalso be used, in some embodiments, to form composite user connectivityvalues indicative of trust. The subjective, objective, or both types ofmeasures may be automatically harvested or manually inputted foranalysis.

In some embodiments, a decision-making algorithm may access theconnectivity values in order to make automatic decisions (e.g.,automatic network-based decisions, such as authentication or identityrequests) on behalf of a user. Connectivity values may additionally oralternatively be outputted to external systems and processes located atthird-parties. The external systems and processes may be configured toautomatically initiate a transaction (or take some particular course ofaction) based, at least in part, on received connectivity values. Forexample, electronic or online advertising may be targeted to subgroupsof members of a network community based, at least in part, on networkconnectivity values.

In some embodiments, a decision-making algorithm may access theconnectivity values to make decisions prospectively (e.g., before ananticipated event like a request for credit). Such decisions may be madeat the request of a user, or as part of an automated process (e.g., acredit bureau's periodic automated analysis of a database of customerinformation). This prospective analysis may allow for the initiation ofa transaction (or taking of some particular action) in a fluid and/ordynamic manner.

In some embodiments, connectivity values may be used to presentinformation to the user. This information may include, but is notlimited to, static and/or interactive visualizations of connectivityvalues within a user's associated network community or communities. Insome embodiments, this information may allow the user to explore orinteract with an associated network community or communities, andencourage and/or discourage particular interactions within a user'sassociated network community or communities. In some embodiments, thisinformation may explicitly present the user with the connectivityvalues. For example, a percentage may indicate how trustworthy anotherindividual and/or entity is to a user. In some embodiments, theinformation may implicitly present the user with a representation of theconnectivity values. For example, an avatar representing anotherindividual and/or entity may change in appearance based on howtrustworthy that individual and/or entity is to a user.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The above and other features of the present invention, its nature andvarious advantages will be more apparent upon consideration of thefollowing detailed description, taken in conjunction with theaccompanying drawings, and in which:

FIG. 1 is an illustrative block diagram of a network architecture usedto support connectivity within a network community in accordance withone embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 2 is another illustrative block diagram of a network architectureused to support connectivity within a network community in accordancewith one embodiment of the invention;

FIGS. 3A and 3B show illustrative data tables for supportingconnectivity determinations within a network community in accordancewith one embodiment of the invention;

FIGS. 4A-4H show illustrative processes for supporting connectivitydeterminations within a network community in accordance with oneembodiment of the invention; and

FIG. 5 shows an illustrative process for querying all paths to a targetnode and computing a network connectivity value in accordance with oneembodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Systems and methods for determining the connectivity between nodes in anetwork community are provided. As defined herein, a “node” may includeany user terminal, network device, computer, mobile device, accesspoint, robot, or any other electronic device capable of being uniquelyidentified within a network community. For example, nodes may includerobots (or other machines) assigned unique serial numbers or networkdevices assigned unique network addresses. In some embodiments, a nodemay also represent an individual human being, entity (e.g., a legalentity, such as a public or private company, corporation, limitedliability company (LLC), partnership, sole proprietorship, or charitableorganization), concept (e.g., a social networking group), animal, orinanimate object (e.g., a car, aircraft, or tool). As also definedherein, a “network community” may include a collection of nodes and mayrepresent any group of devices, individuals, or entities.

For example, all or some subset of the users of a social networkingwebsite or social networking service (or any other type of website orservice, such as an online gaming community) may make up a singlenetwork community. Each user may be represented by a node in the networkcommunity. As another example, all the subscribers to a particularnewsgroup or distribution list may make up a single network community,where each individual subscriber may be represented by a node in thenetwork community. Any particular node may belong in zero, one, or morethan one network community, or a node may be banned from all, or asubset of, the community. To facilitate network community additions,deletions, and link changes, in some embodiments a network community maybe represented by a directed graph, or digraph, weighted digraph, tree,or any other suitable data structure.

FIG. 1 shows illustrative network architecture 100 used to support theconnectivity determinations within a network community. A user mayutilize access application 102 to access application server 106 overcommunications network 104. For example, access application 102 mayinclude a standard web browser, application server 106 may include a webserver, and communication network 106 may include the Internet. Accessapplication 102 may also include proprietary applications specificallydeveloped for one or more platforms or devices. For example, accessapplication 102 may include one or more instances of an Apple iOS,Android, or WebOS application or any suitable application for use inaccessing application 106 over communications network 104. Multipleusers may access application service 106 via one or more instances ofaccess application 102. For example, a plurality of mobile devices mayeach have an instance of access application 102 running locally on thedevices. One or more users may use an instance of access application 102to interact with application server 106.

Communication network 104 may include any wired or wireless network,such as the Internet, WiMax, wide area cellular, or local area wirelessnetwork. Communication network 104 may also include personal areanetworks, such as Bluetooth and infrared networks. Communications oncommunications network 104 may be encrypted or otherwise secured usingany suitable security or encryption protocol.

Application server 106, which may include any network server or virtualserver, such as a file or web server, may access data sources 108locally or over any suitable network connection. Application server 106may also include processing circuitry (e.g., one or moremicroprocessors), memory (e.g., RAM, ROM, and hybrid types of memory),storage devices (e.g., hard drives, optical drives, and tape drives).The processing circuitry included in application server 106 may executea server process for supporting the network connectivity determinationsof the present invention, while access application 102 executes acorresponding client process. The processing circuitry included inapplication server 106 may also perform any of the calculations andcomputations described herein in connection with determining networkconnectivity. In some embodiments, a computer-readable medium withcomputer program logic recorded thereon is included within applicationserver 106. The computer program logic may determine the connectivitybetween two or more nodes in a network community and it may or may notoutput such connectivity to a display screen or data store.

For example, application server 106 may access data sources 108 over theInternet, a secured private LAN, or any other communications network.Data sources 108 may include one or more third-party data sources, suchas data from third-party social networking services, third-party ratingsbureaus, and document issuers (e.g., driver's license and license plateissuers, such as the Department of Motor Vehicles). For example, datasources 108 may include user and relationship data (e.g., “friend” or“follower” data) from one or more of Facebook, MySpace, openSocial,Friendster, Bebo, hi5, Orkut, PerfSpot, Yahoo! 360, Gmail, Yahoo! Mail,Hotmail, other email-based services and accounts, LinkedIn, Twitter,Google Buzz, Really Simple Syndication readers, or any other socialnetworking website or information service. Data sources 108 may alsoinclude data stores and databases local to application server 106containing relationship information about users accessing applicationserver 106 via access application 102 (e.g., databases of addresses,legal records, transportation passenger lists, gambling patterns,political affiliations, vehicle license plate or identification numbers,universal product codes, news articles, business listings, and hospitalor university affiliations).

Application server 106 may be in communication with one or more of datastore 110, key-value store 112, and parallel computational framework114. Data store 110, which may include any relational databasemanagement system (RDBMS), file server, or storage system, may storeinformation relating to one or more network communities. For example,one or more of data tables 300 (FIG. 3A) may be stored on data store110. Data store 110 may store identity information about users andentities in the network community, an identification of the nodes in thenetwork community, user link and path weights, user configurationsettings, system configuration settings, and/or any other suitableinformation. There may be one instance of data store 110 per networkcommunity, or data store 110 may store information relating to a pluralnumber of network communities. For example, data store 110 may includeone database per network community, or one database may storeinformation about all available network communities (e.g., informationabout one network community per database table).

Parallel computational framework 114, which may include any parallel ordistributed computational framework or cluster, may be configured todivide computational jobs into smaller jobs to be performedsimultaneously, in a distributed fashion, or both. For example, parallelcomputational framework 114 may support data-intensive distributedapplications by implementing a map/reduce computational paradigm wherethe applications may be divided into a plurality of small fragments ofwork, each of which may be executed or re-executed on any core processorin a cluster of cores. A suitable example of parallel computationalframework 114 includes an Apache Hadoop cluster.

Parallel computational framework 114 may interface with key-value store112, which also may take the form of a cluster of cores. Key-value store112 may hold sets of key-value pairs for use with the map/reducecomputational paradigm implemented by parallel computational framework114. For example, parallel computational framework 114 may express alarge distributed computation as a sequence of distributed operations ondata sets of key-value pairs. User-defined map/reduce jobs may beexecuted across a plurality of nodes in the cluster. The processing andcomputations described herein may be performed, at least in part, by anytype of processor or combination of processors. For example, varioustypes of quantum processors (e.g., solid-state quantum processors andlight-based quantum processors), artificial neural networks, and thelike may be used to perform massively parallel computing and processing.

In some embodiments, parallel computational framework 114 may supporttwo distinct phases, a “map” phase and a “reduce” phase. The input tothe computation may include a data set of key-value pairs stored atkey-value store 112. In the map phase, parallel computational framework114 may split, or divide, the input data set into a large number offragments and assign each fragment to a map task. Parallel computationalframework 114 may also distribute the map tasks across the cluster ofnodes on which it operates. Each map task may consume key-value pairsfrom its assigned fragment and produce a set of intermediate key-valuepairs. For each input key-value pair, the map task may invoke a userdefined map function that transmutes the input into a differentkey-value pair. Following the map phase, parallel computationalframework 114 may sort the intermediate data set by key and produce acollection of tuples so that all the values associated with a particularkey appear together. Parallel computational framework 114 may alsopartition the collection of tuples into a number of fragments equal tothe number of reduce tasks.

In the reduce phase, each reduce task may consume the fragment of tuplesassigned to it. For each such tuple, the reduce task may invoke auser-defined reduce function that transmutes the tuple into an outputkey-value pair. Parallel computational framework 114 may then distributethe many reduce tasks across the cluster of nodes and provide theappropriate fragment of intermediate data to each reduce task.

Tasks in each phase may be executed in a fault-tolerant manner, so thatif one or more nodes fail during a computation the tasks assigned tosuch failed nodes may be redistributed across the remaining nodes. Thisbehavior may allow for load balancing and for failed tasks to bere-executed with low runtime overhead.

Key-value store 112 may implement any distributed file system capable ofstoring large files reliably. For example key-value store 112 mayimplement Hadoop's own distributed file system (DFS) or a more scalablecolumn-oriented distributed database, such as HBase. Such file systemsor databases may include BigTable-like capabilities, such as support foran arbitrary number of table columns.

Although FIG. 1, in order to not over-complicate the drawing, only showsa single instance of access application 102, communications network 104,application server 106, data source 108, data store 110, key-value store112, and parallel computational framework 114, in practice networkarchitecture 100 may include multiple instances of one or more of theforegoing components. In addition, key-value store 112 and parallelcomputational framework 114 may also be removed, in some embodiments. Asshown in network architecture 200 of FIG. 2, the parallel or distributedcomputations carried out by key-value store 112 and/or parallelcomputational framework 114 may be additionally or alternativelyperformed by a cluster of mobile devices 202 instead of stationarycores. In some embodiments, cluster of mobile devices 202, key-valuestore 112, and parallel computational framework 114 are all present inthe network architecture. Certain application processes and computationsmay be performed by cluster of mobile devices 202 and certain otherapplication processes and computations may be performed by key-valuestore 112 and parallel computational framework 114. In addition, in someembodiments, communication network 104 itself may perform some or all ofthe application processes and computations. For example,specially-configured routers or satellites may include processingcircuitry adapted to carry out some or all of the application processesand computations described herein.

Cluster of mobile devices 202 may include one or more mobile devices,such as PDAs, cellular telephones, mobile computers, or any other mobilecomputing device. Cluster of mobile devices 202 may also include anyappliance (e.g., audio/video systems, microwaves, refrigerators, foodprocessors) containing a microprocessor (e.g., with spare processingtime), storage, or both. Application server 106 may instruct deviceswithin cluster of mobile devices 202 to perform computation, storage, orboth in a similar fashion as would have been distributed to multiplefixed cores by parallel computational framework 114 and the map/reducecomputational paradigm. Each device in cluster of mobile devices 202 mayperform a discrete computational job, storage job, or both. Applicationserver 106 may combine the results of each distributed job and return afinal result of the computation.

FIG. 3A shows illustrative data tables 300 used to support theconnectivity determinations of the present invention. One or more oftables 300 may be stored in, for example, a relational database in datastore 110 (FIG. 1). Table 302 may store an identification of all thenodes registered in the network community. A unique identifier may beassigned to each node and stored in table 302. In addition, a stringname may be associated with each node and stored in table 302. Asdescribed above, in some embodiments, nodes may represent individuals orentities, in which case the string name may include the individual orperson's first and/or last name, nickname, handle, or entity name.

Table 304 may store user connectivity values. In some embodiments, userconnectivity values may be assigned automatically by the system (e.g.,by application server 106 (FIG. 1)). For example, application server 106(FIG. 1) may monitor all electronic interaction (e.g., electroniccommunication, electronic transactions, or both) between members of anetwork community. In some embodiments, a default user connectivityvalue (e.g., the link value 1) may be assigned initially to all links inthe network community. After electronic interaction is identifiedbetween two or more nodes in the network community, user connectivityvalues may be adjusted upwards or downwards depending on the type ofinteraction between the nodes and the result of the interaction. Forexample, each simple email exchange between two nodes may automaticallyincrease or decrease the user connectivity values connecting those twonodes by a fixed amount. More complicated interactions (e.g., product orservice sales or inquires) between two nodes may increase or decreasethe user connectivity values connecting those two nodes by some largerfixed amount. In some embodiments, user connectivity values between twonodes may always be increased unless a user or node indicates that theinteraction was unfavorable, not successfully completed, or otherwiseadverse. For example, a transaction may not have been timely executed oran email exchange may have been particularly displeasing. Adverseinteractions may automatically decrease user connectivity values whileall other interactions may increase user connectivity values (or have noeffect). In addition, user connectivity values may be automaticallyharvested using outside sources. For example, third-party data sources(such as ratings agencies and credit bureaus) may be automaticallyqueried for connectivity information. This connectivity information mayinclude completely objective information, completely subjectiveinformation, composite information that is partially objective andpartially subjective, any other suitable connectivity information, orany combination of the foregoing.

In some embodiments, user connectivity values may be manually assignedby members of the network community. These values may represent, forexample, the degree or level of trust between two users or nodes or onenode's assessment of another node's competence in some endeavor. Asdescribed above, user connectivity values may include a subjectivecomponent and an objective component in some embodiments. The subjectivecomponent may include a trustworthiness “score” indicative of howtrustworthy a first user or node finds a second user, node, community,or subcommunity. This score or value may be entirely subjective andbased on interactions between the two users, nodes, or communities. Acomposite user connectivity value including subjective and objectivecomponents may also be used. For example, third-party information may beconsulted to form an objective component based on, for example, thenumber of consumer complaints, credit score, socio-economic factors(e.g., age, income, political or religions affiliations, and criminalhistory), or number of citations/hits in the media or in search enginesearches. Third-party information may be accessed using communicationsnetwork 104 (FIG. 1). For example, a third-party credit bureau'sdatabase may be polled or a personal biography and backgroundinformation, including criminal history information, may be accessedfrom a third-party database or data source (e.g., as part of datasources 108 (FIG. 1) or a separate data source) or input directly by anode, user, or system administrator.

Table 304 may store an identification of a link head, link tail, anduser connectivity value for the link. Links may or may not bebidirectional. For example, a user connectivity value from node n₁ tonode n₂ may be different (and completely separate) than a link from noden₂ to node n₁. Especially in the trust context described above, eachuser can assign his or her own user connectivity value to a link (i.e.,two users need not trust each other an equal amount in someembodiments).

Table 306 may store an audit log of table 304. Table 306 may be analyzedto determine which nodes or links have changed in the network community.In some embodiments, a database trigger is used to automatically insertan audit record into table 306 whenever a change of the data in table304 is detected. For example, a new link may be created, a link may beremoved, or a user connectivity value may be changed. This audit log mayallow for decisions related to connectivity values to be madeprospectively (i.e., before an anticipated event). Such decisions may bemade at the request of a user, or as part of an automated process, suchas the processes described below with respect to FIG. 5. Thisprospective analysis may allow for the initiation of a transaction (ortaking of some particular action) in a fluid and/or dynamic manner.After such a change is detected, the trigger may automatically create anew row in table 306. Table 306 may store an identification of thechanged node, and identification of the changed link head, changed linktail, and the user connectivity value to be assigned to the changedlink. Table 306 may also store a timestamp indicative of the time of thechange and an operation code. In some embodiments, operation codes mayinclude “insert,” “update,” or “delete” operations, corresponding towhether a link was inserted, a user connectivity value was changed, or alink was deleted, respectively. Other operation codes may be used inother embodiments.

FIG. 3B shows illustrative data structure 310 used to support theconnectivity determinations of the present invention. In someembodiments, data structure 310 may be stored using key-value store 112(FIG. 1), while tables 300 are stored in data store 110 (FIG. 1). Asdescribed above, key-value store 112 (FIG. 1) may implement an HBasestorage system and include BigTable support. Like a traditionalrelational database management system, the data shown in FIG. 3B may bestored in tables. However, the BigTable support may allow for anarbitrary number of columns in each table, whereas traditionalrelational database management systems may require a fixed number ofcolumns.

Data structure 310 may include node table 312. In the example shown inFIG. 3B, node table 312 includes several columns. Node table 312 mayinclude row identifier column 314, which may store 64-bit, 128-bit,256-bit, 512-bit, or 1024-bit integers and may be used to uniquelyidentify each row (e.g., each node) in node table 312. Column 316 mayinclude a list of all the incoming links for the current node. Column318 may include a list of all the outgoing links for the current node.Node table 312 may also include one or more “bucket” columns 320 and322. These columns may store a list of paths that connect, for example,a source node to the current node, the current node to a target node, orboth. As described above, grouping paths by the last node in the path(e.g., the target node), the first node in the path (e.g., the sourcenode), or both, may facilitate connectivity computations. As shown inFIG. 3B, in some embodiments, to facilitate scanning, bucket columnnames may include the target node identifier appended to the end of the“bucket:” column name.

FIGS. 4A-4H show illustrative processes for determining the connectivityof nodes within a network community. FIG. 4A shows process 400 forupdating a connectivity graph (or any other suitable data structure)associated with a network community. As described above, in someembodiments, each network community is associated with its ownconnectivity graph, digraph, tree, or other suitable data structure. Inother embodiments, a plurality of network communities may share one ormore connectivity graphs (or other data structure).

In some embodiments, the processes described with respect to FIG. 4A-4Hmay be executed to make decisions prospectively (i.e., before ananticipated event). Such decisions may be made at the request of a user,or as part of an automated process, such as the processes describedbelow with respect to FIG. 5. This prospective analysis may allow forthe initiation of a transaction (or taking of some particular action) ina fluid and/or dynamic manner.

In some embodiments, the processes described with respect to FIG. 4A-4Hmay be executed to provide information to a user. Such presentations maybe made at the request of a user, or as part of an automatedpresentation. This information may include, but is not limited to,static and/or interactive visualizations of connectivity values within auser's associated network community or communities. In some embodiments,this information may be integrated into explorations of or interactionswithin a user's associated network community or communities. Providingthis information to a user may allow the user to better understand whatother individuals and/or entities they may trust within a networkcommunity, and/or may encourage and/or discourage particularinteractions within a user's associated network community orcommunities.

At step 402, a determination is made whether at least one node haschanged in the network community. As described above, an audit recordmay be inserted into table 306 (FIG. 3) after a node has changed. Byanalyzing table 306 (FIG. 3), a determination may be made (e.g., byapplication server 106 of FIG. 1) that a new link has been added, anexisting link has been removed, or a user connectivity value haschanged. If, at step 404, it is determined that a node has changed, thenprocess 400 may continue to step 410 (shown in FIG. 4B) to process thechanged links, step 412 (shown in FIG. 4C) to save the nodes withchanged links, step 414 (shown in FIG. 4D) to create path set inputfiles, step 416 (shown in FIG. 4E) to remove paths with changed nodes,one or more iterations of step 418 (shown in FIG. 4F) to grow paths byone link at a time, step 420 (shown in FIG. 4G) to save the paths thathave grown by one or more links, and step 422 (shown in FIG. 4H) to joinpaths that go through changed nodes. It should be noted that more thanone step or task shown in FIGS. 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, 4F, 4G, and 4H may beperformed in parallel using, for example, a cluster of cores. Forexample, multiple steps or tasks shown in FIG. 4B may be executed inparallel or in a distributed fashion, then multiple steps or tasks shownin FIG. 4C may be executed in parallel or in a distributed fashion, thenmultiple steps or tasks shown in FIG. 4D may be executed in parallel orin a distributed fashion, then multiple steps or tasks shown in FIG. 4Emay be executed in parallel or in a distributed fashion, and so on. Inthis way, overall latency associated with process 400 may be reduced.

As described above, step 418 may be executed one or more times. Thisstep may be operative to grow paths by a single link. Each iteration ofstep 418 may take as input the results of a previous iteration of step418 so that paths may grow by more than one link, if desired. In theexample of FIG. 4A, three iterations of step 418 are shown. Thus,process 400 may generate paths with lengths less than or equal to three.In other embodiments, more or fewer iterations of step 418 may allowprocess 400 to generate paths with more or fewer

If a node change is not detected at step 404, then process 400 enters asleep mode at step 406. For example, in some embodiments, an applicationthread or process may continuously check to determine if at least onenode or link has changed in the network community. In other embodiments,the application thread or process may periodically check for changedlinks and nodes every n seconds, where n is any positive number. Afterthe paths are calculated that go through a changed node at step 416 orafter a period of sleep at step 406, process 400 may determine whetheror not to loop at step 408. For example, if all changed nodes have beenupdated, then process 400 may stop at step 418. If, however, there aremore changed nodes or links to process, then process 400 may loop atstep 408 and return to step 404.

In practice, one or more steps shown in process 400 may be combined withother steps, performed in any suitable order, performed in parallel(e.g., simultaneously or substantially simultaneously), or removed.

FIGS. 4B-4H each include processes with a “map” phase and “reduce”phase. As described above, these phases may form part of a map/reducecomputational paradigm carried out by parallel computational framework114 (FIG. 1), key-value store 112 (FIG. 1), or both. As shown in FIG.4B, in order to process link changes, map phase 426 may includedetermining if there are any more link changes at step 428, retrievingthe next link change at step 430, mapping the tail to out-link change atstep 432, and mapping the head to in-link change at step 434.

If there are no more link changes at step 428, then, in reduce phase436, a determination may be made at step 438 that there are more nodeswith mapped link changes to process. If so, then the next node and itslink changes may be retrieved at step 440. The most recent link changesmay be preserved at step 442 while any intermediate link changes arereplaced by more recent changes. For example, the timestamp stored intable 306 (FIG. 3) may be used to determine the time of every link ornode change. At step 444, the average out-link user connectivity valuemay be calculated. For example, if node n₁ has eight out-links withassigned user connectivity values, these eight user connectivity valuesmay be averaged at step 444. At step 446, each out-link's weight may becalculated in accordance with equation (1) or (2) above. At step 448, anoutput file may be created or appended with the out-links changed andcorresponding changed node identifier. For example, one or more(out-links changed, node identifier) records may be written to theoutput file. Although the term “file” is sometimes used herein, theoutput need not be in a literal file or even file format. For example,any output stream, whether or not it is recorded, may be used. In someembodiments, some or all of the output file may be passed directly to acalling application, process, or function from a returning application,process, or function in the form of a stream or object return value. Ifthere are no more nodes and link changes to process at step 438, theprocess may stop at step 450.

As shown in FIG. 4C, in order to save nodes with changed links, mapphase 452 may include determining if there are any more changed nodes atstep 454, retrieving the next changed node at step 456, and mapping“null” to the node at step 458.

If there are no more changed nodes at step 454, then, in reduce phase460, a determination may be made at step 462 that there are more nodesto process. If so, then the next node may be retrieved at step 464. Atstep 466, the in-links and out-links associated with the node may bewritten to a key-value store (e.g., key-value store 112 of FIG. 1). Asdescribed above, the key-value store may implement an HBase cluster (orany other compressed, high performance database system, such asBigTable). If there are no more nodes to process at step 462, theprocess may stop at step 468.

As shown in FIG. 4D, in order to create path set input files, map phase470 may include determining if there are any more (out-links changed,node identifier) records in the output file created or appended at step448 (FIG. 4B). If so, the next record may be retrieved at step 474. Atstep 476, a determination may be made if an out-link has changed. If so,then at step 478 a “null” value may be mapped to the node. Otherwise,map phase 470 may return to step 472 to determine if there are any more(out-links changed, node identifier) records in the output file.

If there are no more changed records at step 472, then, in reduce phase480, a determination may be made at step 482 that there are more node toprocess. If so, then the next node may be retrieved at step 484. At step486, new records may be written to the output file. In some embodiments,the records written at step 486 may include records of the form (nodeidentifier, empty path set for the node identifier). If there are nomore nodes to process at step 482, the process may stop at step 488.

As shown in FIG. 4E, in order to remove paths with changed nodes, mapphase 490 may include determining if there are any more (nodeidentifier, path set) records in the output file at step 492 andretrieving the next such record at step 494. At step 496, for every “in”bucket identifier, the “in” bucket identifier may be mapped to a recordof the form (out bucket type, node identifier, set of “out” bucketidentifiers) (or any other suitable form). At step 498, for every “out”bucket identifier, the “out” bucket identifier may be mapped to a recordof the form (in bucket type, node identifier, set of “in” bucketidentifiers) (or any other suitable form). At step 500, the node's “out”buckets may be deleted, and the process may return to step 492 todetermine if there are more records to process.

If there are no more records at step 492, then, in reduce phase 502, adetermination may be made at step 504 that there are more nodeidentifiers with their mapped (bucket type, changed node identifier,bucket identifiers) records to process. If so, then at step 506, if thebucket type is “out”, out-buckets with the given bucket identifiers maybe searched and paths with the changed node identifier may be removed.At step 508, if the bucket type is “in”, in-buckets with the givenbucket identifiers may be searched and paths with the changed nodeidentifier may be removed. If there are no more records to process atstep 504, the process may stop at step 510.

As shown in FIG. 4F, in order to grow paths by one link, map phase 512may include determining if there are any more (node identifier, pathset) records in the output file at step 514. If so, then at step 516, ifthe path set is empty, for each out-link of the node, a link headidentifier may be mapped to the link. At step 518, if the path set isnot empty, then for each path n in the path set, and for each out-linkof a node, a new path may be created by appending (out-link, map linkhead identifier) to the new path.

If there are no more records at step 514, then, in reduce phase 520, adetermination may be made at step 522 that there are more nodeidentifiers with mapped paths to process. If so, then at step 524, newrecords of the form (node identifier, mapped paths) (or any othersuitable form) may be written to the output file. If there are no morerecords to process at step 522, the process may stop at step 526.

The process shown in FIG. 4F may be executed one or more times, with theresult of growing path lengths by one link for each execution. As shownin FIG. 4A, in some embodiments, three iterations of the process shownin FIG. 4F are used to grow paths by three links. In other embodiments,more or fewer iterations are used.

As shown in FIG. 4G, in order to save the new paths, map phase 528 mayinclude determining if there are any more (node identifier, path set)records in the output file at step 530. If so, then at step 532, foreach path in the path set, the path tail identifier may be mapped to thepath. At step 534, for each path in the path set, the path headidentifier may be mapped to the path.

If there are no more records at step 530, then, in reduce phase 536, adetermination may be made at step 538 that there are more nodeidentifiers with mapped paths to process. If so, then at step 540, ifthe path tail identifier equals the node identifier, then that path maybe added to the node's “out” bucket for the path head identifier. Atstep 542, if the path head identifier equals the node identifier, thenthat path may be added to the node's “in” bucket for the path tailidentifier. At step 544, the node may be saved. If there are no morerecords to process at step 538, the process may stop at step 546.

As shown in FIG. 4H, in order to join paths that go through changednodes, map phase 548 may include determining if there are any more (nodeidentifier, path set) records in the output file at step 550. If so,then at step 552, all paths in “in” buckets may be joined with all pathsin “out” buckets. At step 554, for each qualified joined path withlength less than or equal to three (or the number of iterations of theprocess shown in FIG. 4F), the path tail identifier may be mapped to thepath, and the path head identifier may also be mapped to the path.

If there are no more records at step 550, then, in reduce phase 556, adetermination may be made at step 558 that there are more nodeidentifiers with mapped paths to process. If so, then at step 560, ifthe path tail identifier equals the node identifier, then that path maybe added to the node's “out” bucket for the path head identifier. Atstep 562, if the path head identifier equals the node identifier, thenthat path may be added to the node's “in” bucket for the path tailidentifier. At step 564, the node may be saved. If there are no morerecords to process at step 558, the process may stop at step 566.

FIG. 5 shows illustrative process 580 for supporting a user query forall paths from a first node to a target node. For example, a first node(representing, for example, a first individual or entity) may wish toknow how connected the first node is to some second node (representing,for example, a second individual or entity) in the network community. Inthe context of trust described above (and where the user connectivityvalues represent, for example, at least partially subjective user trustvalues), this query may return an indication of how much the first nodemay trust the second node. In general, the more paths connecting the twonodes may yield a greater (or lesser if, for example, adverse ratingsare used) network connectivity value (or network trust amount).

At step 582, for each source node “out” bucket, the corresponding “in”bucket of target nodes may be located. For example, column 320 of nodetable 312 (both of FIG. 3B) may be accessed at step 582. Paths from thesource node's “out” bucket may then be joined with paths in the targetnode's “in” bucket at step 584. Joined paths with paths in the sourcenode's “out” bucket may then be returned for the target node'sidentifier. Process 580 may stop at step 588.

Having returned all paths between the source and target node (of lengthless than or equal to three, or any other suitable value depending onthe number of iterations of the process shown in FIG. 4F), a networkconnectivity value may be computed. The path weights assigned to thepaths returned at step 586 may then be summed. The path weights may benormalized by dividing each path weight by the computed sum of the pathweights. A network connectivity value may then be computed. For example,each path's user connectivity value may be multiplied by its normalizedpath weight. The network connectivity value may then be computed in someembodiments in accordance with:

t _(network) =Σt _(path) ×w _(path)  (7)

where t_(path) is the user connectivity value for a path (given inaccordance with equation (5)) and w_(path) is the normalized weight forthat path. The network connectivity value may then be held, output byprocessing circuitry of application server 106, and/or stored on datastore 110 (FIG. 1). In addition, a decision-making algorithm may accessthe network connectivity value in order to make automatic decisions(e.g., automatic network-based decisions, such as authentication oridentity requests) on behalf of the user. Network connectivity valuesmay additionally or alternatively be outputted to external systems andprocesses located at third-parties. The external systems and processesmay be configured to automatically initiate a transaction (or take someparticular course of action) based, at least in part, on the receivednetwork connectivity values. For example, some locales or organizationsmay require identity references in order to apply for a document (e.g.,a passport, driver's license, group or club membership card, etc.). Theidentity reference or references may vouch that an individual actuallyexists and/or is the individual the applicant is claiming to be. Networkconnectivity values may be queried by the document issuer (e.g., a localgovernment agency, such as the Department of Motor Vehicles or a privateorganization) and used as one (or the sole) metric in order to verifythe identity of the applicant, the identity of an identity reference, orboth. In some embodiments, network connectivity values may be used as anadded assurance of the identity of an applicant or reference inconjunction with more traditional forms of identification (e.g.,document verification and knowledge-based identity techniques). If thedocument issuer (or some other party trusted by the document issuer) hasa set of strong paths from the applicant or reference, this may indicatea higher degree of confidence in the identity of the applicant orreference. Such an indication may be outputted to the third-party systemor process.

As another example, credit-granting decisions may be made by thirdparties based, at least in part, network connectivity values. One ormore queries for a network connectivity value may be automaticallyexecuted by the credit-granting institution (e.g., a bank, privatefinancial institution, department store) as part of the creditapplication process. For example, a query for a network connectivityvalue between the applicant and the credit-granting institution itself(or it's directors, board members, etc.) and between the applicant andone or more trusted nodes may be automatically executed as part of thecredit application process. The one or more network connectivity valuesreturned to the credit-granting institution may then be used as an inputto a proprietary credit-granting decision algorithm. In this way, acredit-granting decision may be based on a more traditional component(e.g., occupation, income, repayment delinquencies, and credit score)and a network connectivity component. Each component may be assigned aweight and a weighted sum or weighted average may be computed. Theweighted sum or average may then be used directly to make an automaticcredit-granting decision for the applicant. The weights assigned to eachcomponent of the weighted sum or average may be based on such factors asthe applicant's credit history with the financial institution, theamount of credit requested, the degree of confidence in the trustednodes, any other suitable factor, or any combination of the foregoingfactors.

In practice, one or more steps shown in process 580 may be combined withother steps, performed in any suitable order, performed in parallel(e.g., simultaneously or substantially simultaneously), or removed. Inaddition, as described above, various threshold functions may be used inorder to reduce computational complexity. For example, a thresholdfunction defining the maximum number of links to traverse may bedefined. Paths containing more than the threshold specified by thethreshold function may not be considered in the network connectivitydetermination. In addition, various threshold functions relating to linkand path weights may be defined. Links or paths below the thresholdweight specified by the threshold function may not be considered in thenetwork connectivity determination.

Although process 580 describes a single user query for all paths from afirst node to a target node, in actual implementations groups of nodesmay initiate a single query for all the paths from each node in thegroup to a particular target node. For example, multiple members of anetwork community may all initiate a group query to a target node.Process 580 may return an individual network connectivity value for eachquerying node in the group or a single composite network connectivityvalue taking into account all the nodes in the querying group. Forexample, the individual network connectivity values may be averaged toform a composite value or some weighted average may be used. The weightsassigned to each individual network connectivity value may be based onseniority in the community (e.g., how long each node has been a memberin the community), rank, or social stature. In addition, in someembodiments, a user may initiate a request for network connectivityvalues for multiple target nodes in a single query. For example, node n₁may wish to determine network connectivity values between it andmultiple other nodes. For example, the multiple other nodes mayrepresent several candidates for initiating a particular transactionwith node n₁. By querying for all the network connectivity values in asingle query, the computations may be distributed in a parallel fashionto multiple cores so that some or all of the results are computedsubstantially simultaneously.

In addition, queries may be initiated in a number of ways. For example,a user (represented by a source node) may identify another user(represented by a target node) in order to automatically initiateprocess 580. A user may identify the target node in any suitable way,for example, by selecting the target node from a visual display, graph,or tree, by inputting or selecting a username, handle, network address,email address, telephone number, geographic coordinates, or uniqueidentifier associated with the target node, or by speaking apredetermined command (e.g., “query node 1” or “query node group 1, 5,9” where 1, 5, and 9 represent unique node identifiers). After anidentification of the target node or nodes is received, process 580 maybe automatically executed. The results of the process (e.g., theindividual or composite network connectivity values) may then beautomatically sent to one or more third-party services or processes asdescribed above.

In an embodiment, a user may utilize access application 102 to generatea user query that is sent to access application server 106 overcommunications network 104 (see also, FIG. 1) and automatically initiateprocess 580. For example, a user may access an Apple iOS, Android, orWebOS application or any suitable application for use in accessingapplication 106 over communications network 104. The application maydisplay a searchable list of relationship data related to that user(e.g., “friend” or “follower” data) from one or more of Facebook,MySpace, openSocial, Friendster, Bebo, hi5, Orkut, PerfSpot, Yahoo! 360,LinkedIn, Twitter, Google Buzz, Really Simple Syndication readers or anyother social networking website or information service. In someembodiments, a user may search for relationship data that is not readilylisted—i.e., search Facebook, Twitter, or any suitable database ofinformation for target nodes that are not displayed in the searchablelist of relationship data. A user may select a target node as describedabove (e.g., select an item from a list of usernames representing a“friend” or “follower”) to request a measure of how connected the useris to the target node. Using the processes described with respect toFIGS. 3 and 4A-H, this query may return an indication of how much theuser may trust the target node. The returned indication may be displayedto the user using any suitable indicator. In some embodiments, indicatormay be a percentage that indicates how trustworthy the target node is tothe user.

In some embodiments, a user may utilize access application 102 toprovide manual assignments of at least partially subjective indicationsof how trustworthy the target node is. For example, the user may specifythat he or she trusts a selected target node (e.g., a selected “friend”or “follower”) to a particular degree. The particular degree may be inthe form of a percentage that represents the user's perception of howtrustworthy the target node is. The user may provide this indicationbefore, after, or during process 580 described above. The indicationprovided by the user (e.g., the at least partially subjectiveindications of trustworthiness) may then be automatically sent to one ormore third-party services or processes as described above. In someembodiments, the indications provided by the user may cause a nodeand/or link to change in a network community. This change may cause adetermination to be made that at least one node and/or link has changedin the network community, which in turn triggers various processes asdescribed with respect to FIGS. 3 and 4A-4H.

In some embodiments, a user may utilize access application 102 tointeract with or explore a network community. For example, a user may bepresented with an interactive visualization that includes one or moreimplicit or explicit representations of connectivity values between theuser and other individuals and/or entities within the network community.This interactive visualization may allow the user to better understandwhat other individuals and/or entities they may trust within a networkcommunity, and/or may encourage and/or discourage particularinteractions within a user's associated network community orcommunities.

In some embodiments, a path counting approach may be used in addition toor in place of the weighted link approach described above. Processingcircuitry (e.g., of application server 106 (FIG. 1)) may be configuredto count the number of paths between a first node n₁ and a second noden₂ within a network community. A connectivity rating R_(n1n2) may thenbe assigned to the nodes. The assigned connectivity rating may beproportional to the number of paths, or relationships, connecting thetwo nodes. A path with one or more intermediate nodes between the firstnode n₁ and the second node n₂ may be scaled by an appropriate number(e.g., the number of intermediate nodes) and this scaled number may beused to calculate the connectivity rating.

Each equation presented above should be construed as a class ofequations of a similar kind, with the actual equation presented beingone representative example of the class. For example, the equationspresented above include all mathematically equivalent versions of thoseequations, reductions, simplifications, normalizations, and otherequations of the same degree.

The above described embodiments of the invention are presented forpurposes of illustration and not of limitation. The following claimsgive additional embodiments of the present invention.

1.-30. (canceled)
 31. A method for determining network connectivitybetween a first node and a second node connected to the first node by atleast one path, the method comprising: receiving, at a user device, auser request for a network connectivity value between a first entity ofa network community and a second entity of the network community,wherein a first node in a connectivity graph represents the first entityand a second node in the connectivity graph represents the secondentity; transmitting an indication of the user request from the userdevice to a remote server; receiving, at the user device, an indicationof the network connectivity value from the remote server, wherein thenetwork connectivity value is a result of a process comprising:automatically obtaining user interaction information between entities ofthe network community from a plurality of sources; determining userconnectivity values associated with links in the connectivity graphbased on the user interaction information; retrieving, from a memory, afirst list that identifies outgoing paths from the first node;retrieving, from the memory, a second list that identifies incomingpaths to the second node; joining an incoming path to the second nodewith an outgoing path from the first node to produce a joined path; andmultiplying a product of weights associated with links of the joinedpath with a user connectivity value assigned to a link in the joinedpath; and automatically determining at least one prospective decisionregarding the second entity based on a magnitude of the networkconnectivity value.
 32. The method of claim 31, wherein the processresulting in the network connectivity value further comprises accessinga link threshold value, and wherein joining the incoming path to thesecond node with the outgoing path from the first node comprises joiningonly those paths containing fewer links than the accessed link thresholdvalue.
 33. The method of claim 31, wherein the process resulting in thenetwork connectivity value further comprises accessing a path weightthreshold value, and wherein joining the incoming path to the secondnode with the outgoing path from the first node comprises joining onlythose paths with a normalized path weight above the accessed path weightthreshold value.
 34. The method of claim 31, wherein the processresulting in the network connectivity value further comprisescalculating the weights associated with the links of the joined path,and wherein calculating the weights comprises: calculating an average ofuser connectivity values associated with the links of the joined path;and for each link of the joined path, subtracting the average of theuser connectivity values from a user connectivity value assigned to thelink of the joined path.
 35. The method of claim 31, wherein a pluralityof the user connectivity values each represent a subjective user trustvalue or competency assessment.
 36. The method of claim 31, wherein theprocess resulting in the network connectivity value further comprisesaccessing third-party ratings data, and wherein the network connectivityvalue is based, at least in part, on the third-party ratings data. 37.The method of claim 31, wherein joining an incoming path to the secondnode with an outgoing path from the first node comprises accessing datafrom a social networking service.
 38. The method of claim 31, whereinthe user device is associated with the first entity.
 39. The method ofclaim 31, wherein receiving, at the user device, the user request forthe network connectivity value comprises: generating for display, at theuser device, a searchable list of a plurality of entities in the networkcommunity, wherein the plurality of entities comprises the secondentity; and receiving a selection of at least one of the plurality ofentities, wherein the at least one of the plurality of entitiescomprises the second entity.
 40. The method of claim 31, wherein theplurality of sources are chosen from a group consisting of social medianetworks, political party memberships, religious organizationmemberships, ratings agencies, credit bureaus, consumer complaints,criminal histories, legal records, media, search engine results,official document issuers, email services, data syndicators, addressdatabases, transportation passenger lists, gambling databases, businesslistings, hospital affiliations, and university affiliations.
 41. Themethod of claim 31, wherein the network connectivity value is indicativeof trustworthiness associated by the first entity to the second entity.42. The method of claim 31, wherein the connectivity graph is a socialnetwork graph.
 43. The method of claim 31, wherein the user connectivityvalues are indicative of trustworthiness of the entities of the networkcommunity.
 44. A system for determining network connectivity between afirst node and a second node connected to the first node by at least onepath, the system comprising: a user device associated comprisingprocessing circuitry; the processing circuitry configured to: receive auser request for a network connectivity value between a first entity ofa network community and a second entity of the network community,wherein a first node in a connectivity graph represents the first entityand a second node in the connectivity graph represents the secondentity; transmit an indication of the user request to a remote server;receive an indication of the network connectivity value from the remoteserver, wherein the network connectivity value is a result of a processcomprising: automatically obtaining user interaction information betweenentities of the network community from a plurality of sources;determining user connectivity values associated with links in theconnectivity graph based on the user interaction information;retrieving, from a memory, a first list that identifies outgoing pathsfrom the first node; retrieving, from the memory, a second list thatidentifies incoming paths to the second node; joining an incoming pathto the second node with an outgoing path from the first node to producea joined path; and multiplying a product of weights associated withlinks of the joined path with a user connectivity value assigned to alink in the joined path; and automatically determine at least oneprospective decision regarding the second entity based on a magnitude ofthe network connectivity value.
 45. The system of claim 44, wherein theprocess resulting in the network connectivity value further comprisesaccessing a link threshold value, and wherein joining the incoming pathto the second node with the outgoing path from the first node comprisesjoining only those paths containing fewer links than the accessed linkthreshold value.
 46. The system of claim 44, wherein the processresulting in the network connectivity value further comprises accessinga path weight threshold value, and wherein joining the incoming path tothe second node with the outgoing path from the first node comprisesjoining only those paths with a normalized path weight above theaccessed path weight threshold value.
 47. The system of claim 44,wherein the process resulting in the network connectivity value furthercomprises calculating the weights associated with the links of thejoined path, and wherein calculating the weights comprises: calculatingan average of user connectivity values associated with the links of thejoined path; and for each link of the joined path, subtracting theaverage of the user connectivity values from a user connectivity valueassigned to the link of the joined path.
 48. The system of claim 44,wherein a plurality of the user connectivity values each represent asubjective user trust value or competency assessment.
 49. The system ofclaim 44, wherein the process resulting in the network connectivityvalue further comprises accessing third-party ratings data, and whereinthe network connectivity value is based, at least in part, on thethird-party ratings data.
 50. The system of claim 44, wherein joining anincoming path to the second node with an outgoing path from the firstnode comprises accessing data from a social networking service.
 51. Thesystem of claim 44, wherein the user device is associated with the firstentity.
 52. The system of claim 44, wherein the processing circuitry isfurther configured to receive the user request for the networkconnectivity value by: generating for display, at the user device, asearchable list of a plurality of entities in the network community,wherein the plurality of entities comprises the second entity; andreceiving a selection of at least one of the plurality of entities,wherein the at least one of the plurality of entities comprises thesecond entity.
 53. The system of claim 44, wherein the plurality ofsources are chosen from a group consisting of social media networks,political party memberships, religious organization memberships, ratingsagencies, credit bureaus, consumer complaints, criminal histories, legalrecords, media, search engine results, official document issuers, emailservices, data syndicators, address databases, transportation passengerlists, gambling databases, business listings, hospital affiliations, anduniversity affiliations.
 54. The system of claim 44, wherein the networkconnectivity value is indicative of trustworthiness associated by thefirst entity to the second entity.
 55. The system of claim 44, whereinthe connectivity graph is a social network graph.
 56. The system ofclaim 44, wherein the user connectivity values are indicative oftrustworthiness of the entities of the network community.